Comments on: May we have your votes? http://blog.planeto.com/2009/11/22/may-we-have-you-votes/ All that's happening in the world of Planeto Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:57:31 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Joakim Jardenberg http://blog.planeto.com/2009/11/22/may-we-have-you-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Joakim Jardenberg Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:03:37 +0000 http://blog.planeto.com/?p=67#comment-22 Good suggestions, but it looks like dev team managed to get most browsers running, after all. So the next release will mot likely remove the browsercheck. <br><br>Thanks anyway! Good suggestions, but it looks like dev team managed to get most browsers running, after all. So the next release will mot likely remove the browsercheck.

Thanks anyway!

]]> By: Lars Tong Strömberg http://blog.planeto.com/2009/11/22/may-we-have-you-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-20 Lars Tong Strömberg Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:25:26 +0000 http://blog.planeto.com/?p=67#comment-20 Interesting result. <br><br>Gave my 2 available votes (as so many others probably did) on Safari / Chrome. A suggestion could be to make a head to head between these two? Alternative, try same basic voting mechanic, but only 1 vote per person to compare outcome? Or if possible, - a rating 1 - 6 for each alternative to get a clearer ranking?<br><br>My point is that allowing 2 votes per person very likely influenced the result here although it gave a basis for starting to narrowing it down further. Interesting result.

Gave my 2 available votes (as so many others probably did) on Safari / Chrome. A suggestion could be to make a head to head between these two? Alternative, try same basic voting mechanic, but only 1 vote per person to compare outcome? Or if possible, – a rating 1 – 6 for each alternative to get a clearer ranking?

My point is that allowing 2 votes per person very likely influenced the result here although it gave a basis for starting to narrowing it down further.

]]>